games with minutes
29
99th percentile
last played sun 8/30
league median 9
games with minutes
29
99th percentile
last played sun 8/30
league median 9
avg minutes
13.4
39th percentile
league median 16.9
WAR44
0.1
5th percentile
league median 1.0
EPM
-2.6
4th percentile
league median -0.3
avg fpts
12.8
49th percentile
last game 21.5
league median 12.9
-9.5
29th percentile
league avg 0.1
97.6
28th percentile
league avg 106.6
107.0
46th percentile
league avg 106.6
41.7%
33rd percentile
league avg 45.2%
36.7%
52nd percentile
league avg 34.5%
50.7%
24th percentile
league avg 56.1%
1.28
47th percentile
league avg 1.61
4.8%
55th percentile
league avg 5.3%
10.1%
35th percentile
league avg 14.7%
13.4
39th percentile
league avg 17.7
26.6%
88th percentile
league avg 18.7%
80.0
34th percentile
league avg 80.4
Tracking coverage is partial. It is separate from the boxscore-based metrics above.
Oakleaf data-engine rows. Coverage compares source counts; it does not certify every value. Other seasons and NBA playoff windows have separate samples.
Updated Aug 25, 10:15 PM CDTTeja Oblak's minutes remain rotation-dependent
Teja Oblak remains a second-unit or depth option for the Portland Fire. She has averaged 13.0 minutes across her last 5 appearances. She was not used in 4 of her last 7 recorded team games. Her path to a larger workload is tied to a clear rotation opening, a matchup choice, or strong play during a shorter stint. Until one of those changes arrives, this should be treated as a healthy reserve role with an occasional DNP risk, not an injury absence.
Impact when this player is out.
| Teammate | Usage% | Min | Games |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jordan Harrison | +9.3% | 14.6 | 5 |
| Carla Leite | +4.6% | 24.0 | 6 |
| Nyadiew Puoch | +2.7% | 19.7 | 6 |
| Emily Engstler | +2.3% | 24.7 | 6 |
| Frieda Buhner | +1.7% | 14.8 | 5 |
| Karlie Samuelson | +0.1% | 15.8 | 6 |
| Bridget Carleton | +0.1% | 31.8 | 5 |
| Megan Gustafson | -0.8% | 25.1 | 6 |
| Holly Winterburn | -2.5% | 16.3 | 6 |
| Serah Williams | -4.4% | 14.5 | 6 |
2026 shooting density from live shot-detail rows.
| Game | Min | Pts | FG | FGA | FG% | 3PM | 3PA | 3P% | FT | FTA | FT% | Reb | OREB | DREB | Ast | Stl | Blk | Tov | FPTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8/30/26 vs GSV | 21.9 | 5 | 2 | 8 | 25% | 1 | 5 | 20% | 0 | 0 | n/a | 4 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 21.5 |
| 8/25/26 @ DAL | 10.7 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0% | 0 | 1 | 0% | 0 | 0 | n/a | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2.5 |
| 8/21/26 @ TOR | 8.3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0 | 0 | n/a | 0 | 0 | n/a | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8.5 |
| 8/14/26 @ SEA | 12.6 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0% | 0 | 2 | 0% | 0 | 0 | n/a | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4.8 |
| 8/12/26 vs MIN | 21.5 | 11 | 4 | 9 | 44% | 2 | 3 | 67% | 1 | 2 | 50% | 6 | 2 | 4 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 38.0 |
| 8/2/26 vs LAS | 13.4 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 71% | 1 | 2 | 50% | 1 | 2 | 50% | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 22.0 |
| 7/31/26 vs IND | 9.4 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 33% | 1 | 3 | 33% | 0 | 0 | n/a | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 12.0 |
| 7/28/26 @ LVA | 15.2 | 6 | 2 | 5 | 40% | 0 | 2 | 0% | 2 | 2 | 100% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 7.0 |
| 29 Games | 388 | 161 | 63 | 151 | 42% | 22 | 60 | 37% | 13 | 18 | 72% | 46 | 15 | 31 | 92 | 19 | 1 | 72 | 372 |
8/30/26vs GSV(L)69-86
25% usage rate
8/25/26@ DAL(L)78-96
20.7% usage rate
8/21/26@ TOR(L)79-82
15% usage rate
8/14/26@ SEA(W)84-82
20.7% usage rate
8/12/26vs MIN(L)81-85
22.2% usage rate
8/2/26vs LAS(L)101-106
32.4% usage rate
7/31/26vs IND(L)98-112
32% usage rate
7/28/26@ LVA(L)83-98
25% usage rate
7/22/26vs DAL(L)97-101
38.9% usage rate
7/18/26@ MIN(L)93-101
25.9% usage rate
7/16/26@ WAS(W)75-56
42.9% usage rate
7/14/26@ CON(L)87-90
40% usage rate
7/11/26@ ATL(W)102-92
25.9% usage rate
7/9/26vs LVA(L)80-88
25.6% usage rate