games with minutes
40
100th percentile
last played sat 8/29
league median 13
games with minutes
40
100th percentile
last played sat 8/29
league median 13
avg minutes
16.4
49th percentile
league median 16.5
WAR44
0.9
48th percentile
league median 1.0
EPM
-0.8
37th percentile
league median -0.2
avg fpts
13.5
52nd percentile
last game 11.3
league median 12.7
-3.2
45th percentile
league avg 0.1
100.4
30th percentile
league avg 106.3
103.6
62nd percentile
league avg 106.2
46.3%
63rd percentile
league avg 45.7%
0.0%
league avg 33.6%
47.1%
9th percentile
league avg 56.3%
1.61
62nd percentile
league avg 1.58
8.4%
80th percentile
league avg 5.0%
15.7%
67th percentile
league avg 15.0%
16.4
49th percentile
league avg 17.8
16.4%
35th percentile
league avg 18.5%
85.3
86th percentile
league avg 82.3
Tracking coverage is partial. It is separate from the boxscore-based metrics above.
Oakleaf data-engine rows. Coverage compares source counts; it does not certify every value. Other seasons and NBA playoff windows have separate samples.
Updated Aug 25, 10:15 PM CDTElizabeth Williams remains a matchup-dependent reserve
Elizabeth Williams remains a second-unit or depth option for the Chicago Sky. She has averaged 10.8 minutes across her last 5 appearances. Her path to a larger workload is tied to a clear rotation opening, a matchup choice, or strong play during a shorter stint. Until one of those changes arrives, this should be treated as a healthy reserve role with an occasional DNP risk, not an injury absence.
Impact when this player is out.
No qualifying teammate-absence samples were available for this player.
2026 shooting density from live shot-detail rows.
| Game | Min | Pts | FG | FGA | FG% | 3PM | 3PA | 3P% | FT | FTA | FT% | Reb | OREB | DREB | Ast | Stl | Blk | Tov | FPTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8/29/26 @ NYL | 19.9 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 50% | 0 | 0 | n/a | 0 | 0 | n/a | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 11.3 |
| 8/25/26 @ CON | 11.3 | 6 | 2 | 5 | 40% | 0 | 0 | n/a | 2 | 4 | 50% | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 12.5 |
| 8/23/26 vs IND | 14.7 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 0 | 0 | n/a | 4 | 4 | 100% | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 15.3 |
| 8/21/26 vs GSV | 4.8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | n/a | 0 | 0 | n/a | 0 | 0 | n/a | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 8/18/26 vs NYL | 8.3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | n/a | 0 | 0 | n/a | 1 | 2 | 50% | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7.5 |
| 8/16/26 @ SEA | 13.8 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 40% | 0 | 0 | n/a | 0 | 0 | n/a | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7.0 |
| 8/12/26 @ GSV | 12.3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0% | 0 | 0 | n/a | 0 | 0 | n/a | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6.5 |
| 8/10/26 @ SEA | 18.5 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 20% | 0 | 0 | n/a | 0 | 1 | 0% | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.8 |
| 40 Games | 655 | 201 | 81 | 175 | 46% | 0 | 0 | n/a | 39 | 87 | 45% | 137 | 49 | 88 | 53 | 22 | 31 | 33 | 541 |
8/29/26@ NYL(L)66-85
12.5% usage rate
8/25/26@ CON(L)81-87
23.3% usage rate
8/23/26vs IND(L)90-113
11.8% usage rate
8/21/26vs GSV(W)73-70
0% usage rate
8/18/26vs NYL(W)93-86
4.8% usage rate
8/16/26@ SEA(W)82-80
15.8% usage rate
8/12/26@ GSV(L)71-91
10.3% usage rate
8/10/26@ SEA(L)88-97
11.6% usage rate
8/8/26vs IND(L)86-90
9.4% usage rate
8/5/26vs LAS(W)95-88
20% usage rate
8/3/26vs PHX(L)101-106
13.9% usage rate
8/1/26vs LVA(W)84-83
19.6% usage rate
7/30/26vs CON(W)94-88
17.8% usage rate
7/22/26@ NYL(L)94-95
15.6% usage rate